US
Blu-ray
New Line Home Entertainment
1920x1080
VC-1
Blu-ray
New Line Home Entertainment
1920x1080
VC-1
UK Special Edition
Blu-ray
Optimum Home Entertainment
1920x1080
VC-1
Blu-ray
Optimum Home Entertainment
1920x1080
VC-1
|
US
Blu-ray New Line Home Entertainment 1920x1080 VC-1 |
Pan's Labyrinth |
UK Special Edition
Blu-ray Optimum Home Entertainment 1920x1080 VC-1 |
|
|
@Paku
January 28th 2012 04:03:25 PM
|
| On a real note, I was totally going only by what I've read. Though in fairness, much has been made of the pitch issue on the Nordic release yet as far as I've seen no one had cited the UK special edition as having the same issue - thus I reasonably assumed the issue didn't plague the UK disc on account I would have seen someone bring it up (prior to you). Thanks for the info. Although honestly, having owned many PAL discs with uncorrected audio + a few blu-rays with pitch issues I didn't learn about until after the fact and having never noticed anything myself, I feel pretty certain it's not something that would affect my experience. I recently sol my US disc and still plan to scoop up the UK, all things considered. The ideal scenario would be the muxing route the administrator went, though I'm not currently equipped for such. |
|
@Dave
January 24th 2012 01:35:02 PM
|
| Same transfer. The audio was just upgraded to lossless. |
|
Dave
January 24th 2012 04:27:19 AM
|
| I picked up this Optimum release, did the original release have a different transfer? |
|
@@@Paku
January 23rd 2012 07:29:29 AM
|
| You tooted~* |
|
Paku
January 22nd 2012 12:53:12 AM
|
| @@Paku I'm betting you don't have either editions and are just repeating info you've read? I own the UK special edition. All you have to do is switch between the 5.1 and 2.0 tracks to realise something isn't right. Comparing to the soundtrack CD it's easy to confirm it's the 2.0 track that is correct and the 5.1 track has pitch issues. I'm guessing it was slowed down from a pitch-corrected PAL master. Administrator:
I just compared the US TrueHD 7.1, UK LPCM 2.0 and UK DTD-HD 5.1 and you are absolutely correct. But I think it would only bother me, if I really knew the actors and their voices very well.
Nevertheless I muxed the 7.1 US track with the UK video :) |
|
:)
January 21st 2012 02:50:05 PM
|
| Here's how it breaks down: US - best audio of the English-friendly releases (7.1; 24-bit) UK - best video of the English-friendly releases (less DNR) Nordic - best video but NOT English-friendly (even less DNR than UK) |
|
@Paku
January 21st 2012 02:47:08 PM
|
| NO. That's the Nordic release you're thinking of. UK audio is fine. Good god, everyone in this thread is wrong about everything... LULZ |
|
Paku
January 21st 2012 02:36:54 PM
|
| Be aware that the 5.1 DTS-HD MA track on the UK Blu-ray suffers from pitch issues. The 2.0 LPCM track is fine though. |
|
@ Lordmajestic
January 21st 2012 12:16:41 AM
|
| Why should an English dub matter? It's a Spanish language film, presented in its native language as it should be. Suck it up and read the subtitles |
|
@ es ist schon
January 21st 2012 12:15:18 AM
|
| No, it isn't. |
|
Anonymous
January 20th 2012 10:27:14 PM
|
| Ich würd jetzt einfach mal sagen weil sie wissen das Synchros sowieso schei*e sind ;) UK liegt klar vorne |
|
Lordmajestic
January 20th 2012 08:15:51 PM
|
| @ Administrator: OK, war mir nicht bewusst. Hab's gerade noch mal nachgeprüft und es stimmt. Weiß jemand dafür den Grund warum der keine engl. Synchro bekommen hat? |
|
Es ist schön
January 20th 2012 03:57:50 PM
|
| die us ist besonders schön |
|
Lordmajestic
January 20th 2012 02:31:31 PM
|
| Die US BD ist wirklich nicht schön geworden. Auch die durch die Filter entstehenden Probleme mit EE oder dem Ausfransen von Kanten könnten teilweise auf die sehr
niedrige Bitrate zurück zuführen sein. Was auch noch interessant ist: weder die UK BD noch die US BD schaffen es einen engl. HD-Ton mit zu bringen. Zudem liegen beide nur in 2.0 vor. die DT BD hat da ja zumindest noch 6.1 Ton in DTS-HD. Administrator:
So viel mir bekannt ist, gibt es keine englische Synchronisation für Pan's Labyrith. Die 2.0 Spuren sind für den Audiokommentar von Guillermo del Toro bestimmt. |
|
mr.wood
January 20th 2012 10:08:36 AM
|
| Genau das fiel mir auch zuerst auf. Völlig unnötige Filterei. |
|
Anonymous
January 20th 2012 10:06:54 AM
|
| Wachs' Labyrinth bei der US. Macht eine schlechte BD zu einem imo schlechten Film. |
|
US
January 20th 2012 09:59:38 AM
|
   PLAYLIST REPORT: Name: 00007.MPLS Length: 1:59:09 (h:m:s) Size: 20,214,595,584 bytes Total Bitrate: 22.62 Mbps VIDEO: Codec Bitrate Description ----- ------- ----------- VC-1 Video 15769 kbps 1080p / 23.976 fps / 16:9 / Advanced Profile 3 AUDIO: Codec Language Bitrate Description ----- -------- ------- ----------- DTS-HD Master Audio Spanish 5256 kbps 7.1 / 48 kHz / 5256 kbps / 24-bit (DTS Core: 5.1 / 48 kHz / 1509 kbps / 24-bit) DTS Audio English 255 kbps 2.0 / 48 kHz / 255 kbps / 24-bit SUBTITLES: Codec Language Bitrate Description ----- -------- ------- ----------- Presentation Graphics English 22.661 kbps Presentation Graphics English 25.232 kbps Presentation Graphics Spanish 24.548 kbps  |
|
UK Special Edition
January 20th 2012 09:59:38 AM
|
PLAYLIST REPORT: Name: 00001.MPLS Length: 1:58:51 (h:m:s) Size: 31.725.262.848 bytes Total Bitrate: 35,59 Mbps VIDEO: Codec Bitrate Description ----- ------- ----------- VC-1 Video 29473 kbps 1080p / 23,976 fps / 16:9 / Advanced Profile 3 AUDIO: Codec Language Bitrate Description ----- -------- ------- ----------- DTS-HD Master Audio Spanish 1812 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 1812 kbps / 16-bit (DTS Core: 5.1 / 48 kHz / 768 kbps / 16-bit) LPCM Audio Spanish 2304 kbps 2.0 / 48 kHz / 2304 kbps / 24-bit Dolby Digital Audio English 224 kbps 2.0 / 48 kHz / 224 kbps SUBTITLES: Codec Language Bitrate Description ----- -------- ------- ----------- Presentation Graphics English 22,688 kbps  |